29 Jun 2008

My experience as a student in Chinese and British HE

Link to learning, one question I met often is what are differences between Chinese higher education (HE) and UK HE? In LTEA conference, a similar question, does Chinese use Inquiry-based learning?

I felt that I might need to write something about my own experience through comparing the HE in these two countries. But apparently, my personal experience involved in HE in China was during 1993-2000 and in the UK is during 2003-2008. It’s unfair to compare the educational system in ten years ago China and today’s UK and it has a strong culture context as well. I am not a teacher. What I’m writing here is a view from a learner. I want to list my humble ideas of the key differences based on a reflection on my personal experience. I got benefits from both educational systems as well as had negative experience of both systems. I don’t judge it’s bad or good here because I do believe things are always changing, improving and my experience doesn’t represent a serious research result.

C (HE in China) – U(HE in the UK)
(1) the relationships between teachers and students (undergraduates)

C- Teachers are highly respected by students. There are two examples of Chinese education ideas. According to Han Yu’s (768-824) idea, a teacher is the person who gives all he knows to students, tells them the way to live, and answers students’ questions. Also Confucius (551-479BCE) said, for one day as my teachers, forever I respect them as my parents. Students therefore see a teacher as the one who is wise, knowledgeable and learned. It’s very rude to call a teacher’s name directly.

U- Teachers are facilitator. A teacher is a person who is knowledgeable and helps students to learn. Students do not respect a teacher as their parents but a teacher or a friend. There is an equal sense. Therefore, it’s normal that students call a teacher’s name directly.

(2) the relationship between supervisors and students (postgraduates)

C- A supervisor is a boss and a person who directs students. A lot of research is industry project based. Students do research for the boss most of time and need to report their work to supervisors regularly. Supervisors and students have good relationships. Most of supervisors invite their students to their home for a dinner or meet together in restaurant during big festival time. In general, a student’s achievement reflects the achievement and abilities of his/her supervisor. Therefore, if a student got fail, then it directly affected the supervisor’s fame and further recruiting students.

U- Supervisors are people who give students advices and suggestions. They are likely to meet students on a regular basis and check the student’s progress. The student is expected to have their own research opinions and interests. Supervisors and students have good relationships and the relationship is like colleagues and friends. Not so many supervisors will invite students to go to their home or together for a meal; they prefer to talk with students in a relaxed place, such as cafe. It seems that a student’s achievement/failure does not affect their supervisor’s fame so much. It’s mainly the student’s responsibility.

(3) students’ behaviours (in the classroom and campus)

C- In general, the university has certain regulations to guide students’ behaviours, such as do not wear high-heel shoes, sunglass, hat, and flip-flops in classroom; do not dye hair red, green or bright colour. Do not leave the classroom when the teacher is talking or without their permission. When the teacher walks into the classroom, all students have to stand up and say “good morning” or “good afternoon” to the teacher. When teacher asks a student question, the student needs to stand up and answer. In addition, I rarely see students sit on stairs, a corridor or the ground in the classroom building.

U- Students are very free, wear what they want and even have their breakfast in the classroom when the teacher is talking. Students don’t stand up when they answer questions and they do not stand up when a teacher comes into the classroom.

(4) the visibility of student’s examination results

C- It is open to everyone, the student’s name, registration number, subject and score. So I know my classmates’ results and they know mine. If it’s an excellent/worst essay, it might be presented in the class as an example. I didn’t feel it’s something very private as from primary school to university, my examination results were visible to people. My results of each semester were often directly sent to my parents by the university.

U- It’s private. Only the student and the teacher know the results.

(5) the style of teaching

C- seminar-style; mainly individual coursework; often the teacher is talking from the beginning to the end of the class; sometimes they call a student’s name to answer a question.

U- workshop-style; many group works; more discussion in classroom between peers as well as the teacher and students; more interactions.

(6) negotiation of assignment

C- It’s not often that a student negotiates the submission or results of an assignment with the teacher.

U- It’s normal that a student negotiates the submission or results of an assignment with the teacher.

(7) reference and bibliography style in writing

C- Emphases copyrights, but not highly stress the bibliography and reference styles.

U- Highly emphases copyrights, bibliography, reference styles and the origin of a source.

(8) textbook and reading list

C- In general, textbook fees are included in the tuition fee. Textbooks will be selected and bought by the teacher and issued to every student in the first session of a module. The teacher will suggest some important and relevant books/articles to students; but they won’t check if the students read them or not. Students often focus on those textbooks and notes they made in the class.

U- Often the teacher will suggest some books or a reading list to students in each session. They do not focus on one or two books. In general, students have handouts from the class or resources online that they can access to. Students need to read a wide range of books and articles.

(9) roll-call

C- In general, the teacher checks who does not turn up in the class and calls the roll at the beginning of a class session.

U- The teacher does not check who is missing so often.

(10) class time and arrangement

C- Class sessions are arranged at 8:00-12:00am; 2:00-5:00pm; 7:00-9:00pm. Students have two hours noon break. Each lesson is about 50 minutes and 10-20minutes break between two lessons. Students often study by themselves in scheduled time or free time such as evening time in library or any classroom that is available. In general, a class building is close at 10:00pm. There was no out of hour training at that time.

U- Class sessions are often arranged at 9:00am-4:00pm. There is no particular lunch break; some classes are at 12:00-2:00pm. There is no evening sessions and most classrooms are not available after 6:00pm and students who use the room in the class building need to apply out of hour training. Students often study by themselves in library or their own accommodation.

(11) students’ accommodation

C- Arranged by the university and it’s not one person per room, but a few (2-8) students shared one room. Female and male students are arranged in different buildings separately. Students from different faculties are often arranged in different buildings or different floors. Normally female students are free to go into male students’ accommodations, whereas male students need to get permission from the officer who is in charge of the female’s accommodation to go into a female student’s accommodation. Students who lived in one room always built good and long relationships. They are like sisters or brothers.

U- Booked by students before they arrive at the university. Often in one building, there are female and male students unless the student has the requirements to have same gender students in the same flat. One student per room or a few (2-8) share one flat or a house.

(12) library services

C- Seldom that a library opens 24 hours; not enough books, journals and international journals; limited accessibility; very limited online databases and sources; lack of experienced academic librarians to help students (I do feel there are lots of functions and services that Chinese libraries need to develop)

U- More accessible to diverse sources; flexible services; professional librarians; lack updated books and journals.

(13) examination

C- The university does not have invigilation team. Often teachers invigilate students that they teach or students from the same faculty. Students need to prepare everything that they need in the exam by themselves.

U- The university exam office often provides good exam invigilation team to support and help students attend exams smoothly. They provide many services, such as drink, pens, tissues, etc.

(14) career development

C- Seldom part-time jobs or placement chances for students. Students have practical work opportunities when they are in the final year or do dissertation.

U- Encourage students to do part-time job/voluntary work, placement job. Students have many practical work opportunities.

(15) curriculum

C- To all undergraduate students, Sports, Politics, English are compulsory courses. Many courses are compulsory and a few are optional.

U- Students are more flexible to choose what they are interested in and they are able to change modules easily when they feel the course is not suitable for them.

(16) social activities in universities

C- Students often have social activities in the campus. They go dancing at weekend nights, engage in sports, go to English corner to practice English and meet people, go to cinema, play Karaoke, outings, societies based on interests, cook and chat over tea, engage in sports meetings (every year once, every class will be involved), etc.

U- drink, societies based on interests, sports, outings, people often meet in a cafĂ© or bar, quiz night, weekend “give it a go” trip, cinema. The university does not hold a sport meeting every year.

(17) military training

C- Almost every freshman needs to attend a military training in the first month of their freshman year. The soldiers train students as soldiers. Students wear military uniform and learn shooting, target practice, walk in goose-steps, sing warsongs and behave like a real soldier. Students like those trainers, soldiers and regard them as brothers. The training is unforgettable experience.

U- Not in a general university

(18) individual and the collective

C- A student does not have a strong feeling of individual. There is a sense that a student is always related him/herself to a class or the collective. The class, the flat, the subject or the collective is the core of a unit.

U- Students are very independent. There is a sense that a student is an individual and the individual is the core of a unit.

(NB. There is an article from the Higher Education Careers Services Unit (HECSU), you may be interested in reading.)

28 Jun 2008

The third day of LTEA 2008

Prof. Philippa Levy’s inquiry technologies session calls our attention to the statement of “digital natives” and “the role of technologies in designing inquiry-based learning”. She mentioned “phoebe pedagogic planner”, “London Pedagogy Planner” and talked about the usefulness of LAMS in inquiry-based learning. The use of technology is related to learning styles, disciplines and levels.

Dr George Allan’s workshop “the basics of inquiry-based learning” is interesting and helpful. His explanation of the approach (IAE-Interpreting, Analysis, and Explanation) to motive students to make inquiries in learning is very practical.

In Prof Angela Brew’s speech, she talked about an integrated model of teaching and research (Brew, A. (2006). Research and Teaching: Beyond the Divide. London PalgraveMacmillan).

There is a global conference “Enquiry Based Learning: The Future is now”, 21-25 June 2010, Sheffield Hallam University, Centre For Promoting Learner Autonomy, United Kingdom. Further information emailing cpla@shu.ac.uk

Although I have been in Sheffield about 3 years, it’s the first time to visit the Peak District.

(the picture is the door on Queen Mary’s Brower, Chatsworth House)

26 Jun 2008

Inquiry today’s inquiry-based learning sessions

It’s a rainy day. Reflections on what I got today.

I feel that inquiry-based learning has a premise that it’s student-centred firstly. We see these concepts “student as producer”, “student as designer”, “student as action researcher”, “student as scholar”, “lifelong learner” and so on. Secondly, inquiry-based learning is directly related to self-authenticity as we see those terms “self-directed”, “self-reflection”, “self-evaluation”, “engagement”, “self-perception”, etc.

Multiple technologies (Web 2.0 technologies, e.g., Wikis, Blogs, Blackboard VLE, online journal, Skype, MSN messenger, video conference, webcam, film) have been designed and applied into practice. It seems that blogs and mobiles were not mentioned too much comparing to the use of Wiki and Blackboard by educators to trace students’ contributions to groupwork, collaboration or learning process and to evaluate students’ reflections and development.

Dr. David Hodge mentioned a few learning theories and books in the keynote speech; an important one is “The Learning Paradigm College” written by Robert B. Barr and John Tagg. I googled an article. Through Dr. Hodge’s talking, I see a further and deeper view. It calls my attention on the relationship between ‘age issue’, ‘learning’ and ‘creativity’. It makes me think again that knowledge is not certain, the view of knowledge is it is social construction and contextual. The outcome of learning may fail, but learning is never failed. Learning reflects that the student become see him/herself as a member of a larger community of something (e.g., culture, subject, discipline, etc). To me, it brings a series of questions: is it a learner’s attitude to him/herself in the world; is it a learner’s belief of him/herself in the world; is it a position that the learner locates him/herself, or is it self-identity?


Here is an interesting question from the session “Cultural Academy: a new approach to learning”:
“Who I am” and “who I am not” by thinking of your culture. Triggered another question “Who I am” and “who I am not” by thinking of your discipline/subject.

25 Jun 2008

LTEA Conference 2008: Inquiry in a Networked World

I attend the 3rd Learning Through Enquiry Alliance (LTEA) Summer Conference hold at the University of Sheffield.

As a student also a jobseeker for a new career, I am quite interested in engaging in the collaborations of inquiring “inquiry-based learning”. A bit pity that I don’t have experience of designing modules as well as many issues/questions that may meet in teaching. That’s why I attend it, to learn what I don’t know and find out what I did know.

The discussions about the concept of “inquiry-based learning” is on the wiki.


I learned how to make decisions of using IT in EBL and designing modules. Actually, I feel it would be better if separated each case into a single session because all the module cases are so interesting. Also, I wonder how much time the staff will spend on using IT during running the module and how do they handle the issue that students do not like the specific technology.

Two questions I was asking myself during the sessions:
Q1: What did I learn 10 years ago in class? How much do I still remember?
My answer: most of them may already return to my teachers, but also a lot of them have become a part of my skills/knowledge.
Q2: How do we promote students’ will or passion of learning?
An answer off the top of my head: to find out what their interests and preferences/styles are first…

20 Jun 2008

Reflective thinking of blogging by bloggers

In the long run, I want to see what the blog brings to me by being a blogger and have a solid statement about my own experience of using blogs. That’s why I haven’t stopped this blog; just sometimes I feel that my ideas run dry or I have no useful information to post, then I don’t update it at all.

The little professor” is an example of blogs by people in academia. There are many useful links about library, literature, history on this blog.

Is it easy to maintain a blog by an academic? There may be an answer by Arunn. Blogs allow the blogger to not only purely contribute on providing academic-related information and ideas, but also self-expression (or say, self-indulgent?). I come across a series of blogs starting the New Kid on the Hallway”. Without regard to the validity of these sources, the bloggers’ reflective thinking about their feelings of blogging to an extent supports my own study findings.

I quoted a few statements from the blogs:

“…yes, makes it blogging-as-therapy, but in the spirit of the political being personal and vice versa, it's therapy that the academic profession needs as much as I do. It's not therapy because I'm somehow singularly ill-adjusted; it's therapy because, I firmly believe, many academic settings are hostile to women (and men who wish to challenge traditional gender roles) and there is a fundamental problem with maintaining a balance between the personal and the professional in academia. … As I've said, I don't plan on giving it up, but I also want it to continue to be something of which I'm proud, so there may be periods of neglect when I don't feel like I have something of substance to say.” (from entry: If I'm a blogger, there must be navel-gazing)
… I found a way to keep blogging. Because I realized it mattered to me… I suppose the reason that I haven't is that this medium has really allowed me to figure out who I am as a writer, and it's allowed me to situate myself as an academic in a way that scholarly writing doesn't…. I've never wanted to blog as a means to enhancing my professional standing or as a means to any sort of material success. That's why this blog doesn't bear my name, and that's why I don't do ads on the blog, although I probably could make some (small change) money if I did. No, I started the blog because I wanted not to write in a vacuum. … I'm under no illusions that this is an Important Blog That Does Important Things. It's not. Sometimes it's insightful, sometimes it's entertaining, sometimes it's just crap. But whatever it is, I do feel like it does good stuff, for me, and I hope for you…. a blog really can grow with a person. …blogging isn't for everyone.” (from entry: Blogging Angst, Reassigned Time by Dr. Crazy)
“I am perhaps being hard on myself*...it's true that I've blogged here for support and company and - dare I say it - friendship. That's been important at some crucial times. But I feel as if I'm expecting people to respond to me, demanding something of them somehow, and that makes me uncomfortable…. I suppose all of this is brought into relief, in a sense, because right now I'm going through something on a personal level that I can't imagine blogging about. Though I know it would make some fascinating reading, there's no way I am going to put it out there on a blog. That recognition has made me question why I've put other things out there in the past, and whether it's been for purely narcissistic reasons...Am I reluctant to put the new thing out there because it doesn't necessarily demand sympathy but shows me in a much more complex and possibly harsher way?” (from entry:Post-blogiversary thoughts, Clashing hats by Hilaire)

18 Jun 2008

16 Jun 2008

Reading literature in a GT study

I reread Glaser’s book «Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory» and found Glaser’s (1978: 139) following statement of reading literature in Grounded theory theoretical writing. Linking back to my early post “Literature review in grounded theory” (31 January 2008), it can be seen that Glaser did not say that an analyst’s preemption of a studied area is matter. He suggested that reading literature is a part of the ‘discover’ process and the literature is selected and used in relation to the ‘comparative analysis’ method.
“Reading: We have said that during data collection, coding, memos, and sorting of memos, the analyst should read in other fields so as not to preempt his thoughts regarding the significant variables in the substantive area under research. The analyst should continue this rule throughout the initial draft, if his sorting has not reached a firm integration. This maximizes on another dimension the emergence of his theory.
But when he starts reworking his draft he should make a concerted effort to cover as much literature as possible in the same area in which he is writing his theory. Now the job is to compare his work to others and weave it into its place in the pertinent theoretical and substantive literature. It also sensitizes the analyst to reworking his theory to the best advantage, as he studies how others are theorizing in the field. As noted above, integrative placement of ideas by supplementing, extending, and transcending others’ work is the issue, not their preemption of his ideas.” (Glaser, 1978: 139)

14 Jun 2008

For Saturday

It's a sunny day. I passed by the Ponderosa Park and caught the Peace in the Park carnival.

I come across J.K. Rowling’s commencement speech at Harvard: The Fringe Benefits of Failure, and the Importance of Imagination. It's worth listening when I am about to graduate.

Then, I come across this article "Blog smog: A look at life on the web". It's a bit out of date, but the sources listed there are interesting.

10 Jun 2008

Read blogs and inquiry

Sometimes you don’t know why the author created a blog and contributes to it, and sometime it is difficult to find out their intentions on the blog too. But, you feel it is interesting, the information is worthy of reading. Then you start reading the blog and even don’t think who wrote it and what the purpose of the blog is. I assume most people like this. I may be wrong as I don’t have any statistical data about it. Are there many people read a blog and ask questions, such as who are the authors? where are they from? who are their target audiences? Do they write for a group of people or for readers widely?

For example, Scatterplot is a blog that I come across today. I don’t know any of the authors. I read the entries and comments. It’s interesting and very useful for me to some extent.

9 Jun 2008

News about a conference

There is a conference source: Valuing Higher Education: SRHE Annual Conference 2008 and Postgraduate and Newer Researchers Conference 2008. (9-11 December, Liverpool, UK)

Scripts about blogs in a movie

Recently, I am obsessed by a feeling of ignorance. The more I read and study, the stronger I feel that I know a little and I am able to do a little, to work in fewer and fewer areas. Is it what learning tells me about?

On the weekend, I watched a movie “Sydney White and the Seven Dorks”, which is said that it’s based on the “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” fairy tale. I learned some new words from the movie. Here are a few interesting scripts from the movie:

- “Does anyone know another word for ‘douchebaggery’? I don’t want to use it a third time.”
- “Gurkin, no one reads your whiny blog anyway.”
- “Peoplespunisher.com is not about being read. It’s about being written.”

It sounds that it’s important to have a space to write no matter whether people read it or not. Does it mean the blogger has amazing creativity or is self-appreciation?

5 Jun 2008

A resource about writing

You may be interested in the writing handbook on Capella University's Online Writing Centre

1 Jun 2008

How to explain my research findings?

In a short conversation, I got the questions from one of my colleagues, “What’re findings of your study?”, “How do they facilitate learning?”, “Do your findings answer your research questions?”

I know these may be the questions in the viva. But I feel it’s very difficult for me to answer this kind of question in a normal conversation. If I answer ‘yes’, I may just tell people one or two key points in my mind, but not the whole story; if I answer ‘no’, I may say that I found/did nothing. I start to doubt myself, “Are you really clear of your study and your findings?”, “Do you really have a clear picture of your research?”

Writing is thinking. I hope I do have very clear answers when I finish my whole thesis. Now, it is hard because: one reason is that it is a grounded theory study, which is to present a process of generating a theory. It’s not like a quantitative research, answering like, ‘yes, I found A has relationship with B, B has high connection with C, A is no significant effect on C, etc, etc’. Another reason is that the findings are presented by a few of big concepts and their conceptualisation process, with linking together them by explaining certain relationships among them.

Ehmm, How can I use one sentence or a few sentences to explain my findings explicitly?